Evaluation of the Seroprevalence of Cystic Echinococcosis by the Indirect Hemagglutination (IHA) Method at Balıkesir University Faculty of Medicine: A Seven-year Analysis
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Investigation
VOLUME: 50 ISSUE: 2
P: 66 - 71
June 2026

Evaluation of the Seroprevalence of Cystic Echinococcosis by the Indirect Hemagglutination (IHA) Method at Balıkesir University Faculty of Medicine: A Seven-year Analysis

Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2026;50(2):66-71
1. Balıkesir University Health Practice and Research Hospital Clinic of Medical Microbiology, Balıkesir, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 24.07.2025
Accepted Date: 13.03.2026
Online Date: 15.06.2026
Publish Date: 15.06.2026
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective

Echinococcosis is a zoonotic infection caused by cestodes of the Echinococcus genus. The most common form, cystic echinococcosis, is a chronic parasitic disease caused by the Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato species complex. The aim of our study is to determine the prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in our hospital and to reveal the regional epidemiological characteristics of the disease based on the obtained data.

Methods

In this study, 526 serum samples sent to the medical microbiology laboratory from various hospital departments and outpatient clinics with suspected cystic echinococcosis between 01.07.2018 and 01.07.2025 were evaluated. A commercial ELI.H.A Echinococcus (ELITech Microbio, France) kit was used. The clinical diagnosis, gender, age, delivery department, and demographic characteristics of the patients were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Among the 526 patients evaluated in the study, 302 (57.4%) were female. Of the total applications, 60.5% originated from the general surgery outpatient clinic. Using the IHA test, seropositivity was detected in 21.5% of the 526 patients. When the distribution according to antibody titers was examined, the antibody levels detected in the serum samples were as follows: 6.8% (n=36) at 1/80, 6.1% (n=32) at 1/160, 4% (n=21) at 1/320, 4.9% (n=26) at 1/640, 3.8% (n=20) at 1/1280, 2.8% (n=15) at 1/2560, and 5.9% (n=31) at 1/5120. Among the 90 patients with available clinical data for cystic echinococcosis, the liver was identified as the most frequently involved organ (95.5%). Among 76 patients with available cyst size measurements, most cysts measured 51-100 mm (48.6%). According to the World Health Organization-IWGE classification, CE3b was the most common stage (23.6%).

Conclusion

The obtained data indicate that cystic echinococcosis remains an important public health problem in Balıkesir. Therefore, in light of these findings, it is necessary to strengthen healthcare services for the diagnosis and follow-up of the disease and to place greater emphasis on preventive measures.

Keywords:
Echinococcosis, prevalence, zoonotic

INTRODUCTION

Echinococcosis in humans is a zoonotic infection caused by cestodes belonging to the Echinococcus species. The most commonly observed form, cystic echinococcosis, is a chronic parasitic disease caused by the Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato species complex. Alveolar echinococcosis, on the other hand, is associated with Echinococcus multilocularis. Additionally, two species endemic to the New World—Echinococcus vogeli and Echinococcus oligarthrus—are responsible for a form referred to as “neotropical echinococcosis”. Among these, Echinococcus vogeli causes a disease with polycystic structures, whereas Echinococcus oligarthrus leads to a rare clinical presentation with a single cyst (1).

For the detection of antibodies in the serum samples of patients with cystic echinococcosis, commonly used serological methods include indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA), indirect fluorescent antibody test, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) (2). These tests exhibit high sensitivity, generally ranging from 60% to 90%, depending on the disease stage and the type of antigen used (3). ELISA or IHA tests can be employed for screening purposes; however, it is recommended that positive results be confirmed by methods such as immunoblotting (4).

The aim of our study is to determine the prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in our hospital, to identify the epidemiological characteristics of the disease based on the obtained data, and thereby to contribute to diagnosis, follow-up, and preventive healthcare services.

METHODS

Between 1 July 2018 and 1 July 2025, a total of 526 serum samples were analyzed in this study. These serum samples were obtained from patients who presented to Balıkesir University Health Practice and Research Hospital were sent to the Medical Microbiology Laboratory from various clinics and departments with a preliminary diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis. Patient data were retrospectively analyzed from the hospital information system records. The study included adult patients aged between 18 and 90 years, and only the first test result for each patient was considered. The clinical diagnosis, sex, department from which the sample was sent, demographic features, and clinical parameters of the included patients were retrospectively evaluated. For statistical analysis, patients were categorized into six age groups: 18-30,31-40,41-50,51-60,61-70, and 71 years and above.

As part of the study, specific antibodies against Echinococcus granulosus were semi-quantitatively detected in serum samples using the commercial kit ELI.H.A Echinococcus (ELITech Microbio, France), based on the principle of indirect hemagglutination. The test is based on the reaction of sheep erythrocytes coated with antigen and serum samples. The serum samples were diluted at a ratio of 1:40 using buffer solution. Fifty microliters (50 µL) of buffer solution was added to each of the nine wells. Subsequently, 50 µL of diluted serum and antigen-coated erythrocyte suspension (R1 reagent) was added to the first seven wells. Serial dilutions ranging from 1/80 to 1/5120 were prepared for each sample, and the test was applied accordingly. The eighth well served as a control for natural anti-sheep agglutinins and contained a mixture of serum and uncoated erythrocytes (R2 reagent). The nineth well, containing only buffer and R1 reagent, was used as a reagent control. After a 2-hour incubation at room temperature, the results were evaluated macroscopically. In the presence of specific antibodies, agglutinated sensitized erythrocytes formed a reddish, homogeneous layer on the microplate surface, indicating a positive reaction. In contrast, a ring-shaped sediment at the bottom of the well indicated a negative result. Serologically, titers below 1/80 were considered negative, titers of 1/80 and 1/160 were classified as borderline or equivocal, and titers of 1/320 or higher were accepted as positive (5). The validity of the test was confirmed using both positive and negative control sera (Figure 1).

Statistical Analysis

The data obtained in the study were recorded and statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Numerical data were presented as percentages and mean ± standard deviation. Categorical data were expressed as percentages. The chi-square test was used to compare independent groups containing categorical variables. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Balıkesir University, dated June 3, 2025, with the approval number E.526429, decision number 2025/220.

RESULTS

Of the 526 patients tested for cystic echinococcosis using the ELI.H.A Echinococcus IHA, 302 (57.4%) were female. The mean age of the patients included in the study was 55.5±16.3 years. Among the total 526 cases evaluated, 60.5% were referred from the general surgery outpatient clinic, followed by internal medicine (12.7%), gastroenterology (6.6%), inpatient wards (5.1%), and infectious diseases (4.9%).

The distribution of antibody titers in the serum samples was as follows: 1/80: 6.8% (n=36), 1/160: 6.1% (n=32), 1/320: 4.0% (n=21), 1/640: 4.9% (n=26), 1/1280: 3.8% (n=20), 1/2560: 2.8% (n=15), 1/5120: 5.9% (n=31) (Figure 2). According to the results of the indirect hemagglutination test, 21.5% (n=113) of the patients had seropositivity at a titer of 1/320 or higher. The mean age of seropositive patients was 50.2±16.5 years. When positivity rates were compared across age groups, the highest rates were observed in the 41-50 and 61-70 age groups, each with 19.5% (n=22), while the lowest rate was seen in patients aged 71 and older, with 11.5% (n=13). A statistically significant difference in positivity rates was found between age groups (p=0.003). Among the patients who tested positive, 58 (51.3%) were female. There was no statistically significant difference in seropositivity rates between females and males (p=0.086).

The cyst characteristics and demographic features of patients with cystic echinococcosis with antibody titers ≥1:320 are presented in Table 1. Radiological findings were available for a subset of patients. The liver was the most frequently involved organ (95.5%) among 90 patients with available localization data. Among 76 patients with available cyst size measurements, most cysts measured 51-100 mm (48.6%). According to the World Health Organization (WHO)-IWGE classification, CE3b was the most common stage (23.6%).

Between 2018 and 2025, serological evaluations for cystic echinococcosis revealed variations in seropositivity rates across the years. When examined by year, the seropositivity rates were 50% in 2018 (4/8), 18.8% in 2019 (17/90), 19.6% in 2020 (11/56), 18.6% in 2021 (11/59), 36.7% in 2022 (18/49), 24.5% in 2023 (25/102), 16.8% in 2024 (18/107), and 19.5% in 2025 (9/46) (Table 2). A statistically significant difference was found among the annual seropositivity rates (p=0.049). These findings indicate marked fluctuations in positivity rates over the years, with a noticeable upward trend in 2022 compared to previous years. In our study, the seropositivity rate during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) period (2020-2022) was found to be 32.2% for cystic echinococcosis.

DISCUSSION

Cystic echinococcosis is classified as a neglected tropical disease by the WHO (6). Although cystic echinococcosis is prevalent globally, it is recognized as a significant public health problem particularly in endemic regions such as South America, the Mediterranean Region, Central Asia, Türkiye, Western China, and East Africa (7, 8).

In our study, seropositivity rates varied by age group, with high positivity rates detected in the 41-50 and 61-70 age groups. No statistically significant association was found between gender and test results (p=0.086), indicating that positive test results were observed at similar rates in both male and female patients, and that gender did not significantly influence test outcomes. Several studies in Türkiye have shown that cases of cystic echinococcosis typically present with clinical symptoms after the age of 40, with a peak incidence observed between the ages of 50 and 60 (9). In the study conducted by Taşbent et al., (10) the highest IHA positivity was observed in the 41-65 age group, at a rate of 37.7%. In contrast, Başer et al. (11) reported the highest seropositivity in the 21-40 age group.

In our study, the seroprevalance of cystic echinococcosis was found to be 21.5% at Balıkesir, using the IHA method. According to studies conducted in Türkiye, the prevalence of cystic echinococcosis ranges between 5% and 25%. An overview of publications using the IHA method for detecting seropositivity in cystic echinococcosis is presented in Table 3. In a study conducted by Özkeklikçi and Cirit, (12) a seropositivity rate of 28.6% was reported among patients presenting with suspected cystic echinococcosis to the parasitology laboratory in Gaziantep between 2015 and 2022. In another study by Çelik et al., (13) 1,607 serum samples submitted to Adıyaman University Training and Research Hospital between 2013 and 2020 showed a seropositivity rate of 15.1% via the IHA method. Bağcı and Akarsu (14) evaluated serum samples sent to the Central Laboratory of Ankara University Hospital between 2023 and 2024 using the IHA method and reported a seropositivity rate of 5.9% (14). Taşbent et al. (10) also reported a seropositivity rate of 15.2% (n=143) among 938 patients in Konya. In the study by Alver et al., (15) 19.9% (n=213) of the 1,072 patients who presented to Bursa Uludağ University Hospital with suspected cystic echinococcosis were found to be seropositive using the IHA method. Çiftçi et al. (16) reported a seropositivity rate of 25.1% (n=221) in 879 patient serum samples sent to the microbiology laboratory of Selçuk University Faculty of Medicine between 2010 and 2014 with a preliminary diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis. In the study by Behçet and Avcıoğlu (17), which evaluated patients with suspected cystic echinococcosis using the IHA method, a seropositivity rate of 10.6% was observed among 644 patients. In another study by Başer et al., (11) a seropositivity rate of 21.6% was reported among 1,543 patients who presented with suspected cystic echinococcosis at Selçuk University Faculty of Medicine Hospital between 2015 and 2020. In a study conducted at Balıkesir Atatürk State Hospital, 19.8% of 823 serum samples collected between 2011 and 2013 showed positivity at a titre of 1/320 or higher (18).

In the present study, the liver was the most frequently involved organ (95.5%), followed by the lung (7.7%). This finding is consistent with previous studies conducted in Türkiye (19, 20). Regarding cyst size, the majority of cysts in our study measured 51-100 mm (48.6%). Similarly, in a multicenter study evaluating 170 patients with cystic echinococcosis in Türkiye, most cysts were reported to measure between 5 and 10 cm (47.1%) (21). In terms of WHO-IWGE classification, CE3b was the most common stage (23.6%) in our study. These findings suggest that many patients are diagnosed when cysts reach moderate to large sizes, likely due to the slow-growing nature of the disease.

The seropositivity rate during the COVID-19 period (2020-2022) was found to be 32.2% for cystic echinococcosis in our study. In the study by Ulusan Bağcı (22), a comparison of pre-pandemic (2019 and earlier) and pandemic (2020-2022) periods in İzmir showed that the seropositivity rate decreased from 18.4% to 14.6% during the pandemic period when evaluated using the IHA method.

A total of 6.8% of the serum samples included in the study showed a suspicious reaction at a 1/80 titre, and 6.1% at a 1/160 titre. The IHA method can be used for the screening and diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis. In cases of low-titre suspicious positivity detected by IHA, it is recommended that the test be repeated after two or three weeks (5). As a secondary confirmatory test, Western blot or immunoblot methods are preferred to verify the diagnosis when IHA results are borderline or suspicious (23).

Study Limitations

The limitations of this study include its retrospective design and being conducted at a single center, which restricts the generalizability of the results. The sensitivity and specificity of the indirect hemagglutination test used in the study may vary depending on laboratory conditions and the stage of the disease. In our study, no secondary confirmatory method was used for samples with suspicious titres. In addition, radiological data for some patients could not be accessed. Therefore, multicenter and prospective studies are needed for a more robust analysis of epidemiological data at regional or national levels.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study indicate that cystic echinococcosis remains a significant public health issue in Balıkesir, a region with intensive agricultural and livestock activities. Consequently, it is essential to strengthen healthcare services related to the diagnosis and follow-up of the disease and to place greater emphasis on preventive measures. For effective control of cystic echinococcosis, early diagnosis, efficient monitoring, and increased public awareness initiatives are of critical importance.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Balıkesir University, dated June 3, 2025, with the approval number E.526429, decision number 2025/220.
Informed Consent: Informed consent was no received due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Authorship Contributions

Concept: N.İ., Design: N.İ., Data Collection or Processing: N.İ., Y.Ö., Analysis or Interpretation: N.İ., Y.Ö., T.K.A., A.G.Ş., Literature Search: N.İ., Y.Ö., T.K.A., Writing: N.İ., Y.Ö., T.K.A., A.G.Ş.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Echinococcosis [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): CDC; [cited 2025 Jul 16]. Available from:https://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/echinococcosis/index.html
2
Eckert J, Gemmell MA, Meslin FX, Pawlowski ZS. WHO/OIE manual on echinococcosis in humans and animals: a public health problem of global concern. Paris: WHO/OIE; 2001.
3
Brunetti E, Kern P, Vuitton DA; Writing Panel for the WHO-IWGE. Expert consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of cystic and alveolar echinococcosis in humans. Acta Trop. 2010; 114: 1-16.
4
Kastner RJ, Stone CM, Steinmann P, Tanner M, Tediosi F. Lessons learned from developing an eradication ınvestment case for lymphatic filariasis. Adv Parasitol. 2016; 94: 393-417.
5
5. ELITechGroup Microbiology. ELI.H.A Echinococcus [Internet]. Puteaux (France): ELITechGroup; [cited 2025 Jul 18]. Available from: https://www.elitechgroup.com/microbiology/product/eli-h-a- Echinococcus
6
World Health Organization. Neglected tropical diseases [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025 Dec 14 [cited 2025 Jul 18]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/neglected-tropical-diseases
7
Tünger Ö. Dünyada kistik ekinokokkoz epidemiyolojisi. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2013; 37: 47-52.
8
Hogea MO, Ciomaga BF, Muntean MM, Muntean AA, Popa MI, Popa GL. Cystic echinococcosis in the early 2020s: a review. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024; 9: 36.
9
Aydin MF, Adigüzel E. Evaluation of cystic echinococcosis cases in terms of sociodemographic, clinical and hospitalization features in Karaman Province, Turkey. Iran J Public Health. 2019; 48: 2232-9.
10
Taşbent FE, Yağcı B, Kadıyoran C, İyisoy MS. IHA ve radyolojik yöntemlerin kistik ekinokokkoz ön tanısındaki etkinliklerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirilmesi [Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of ındirect hemagglutination test and radiological methods in the pre-diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis]. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2021; 45: 22-27.
11
Başer S, İsmayıl A, Maçin S. Evaluation of the seropositivity of patients with cystic echinococcosis in Konya, Turkey. J Contemp Med. 2021; 11: 139-41.
12
Özkeklikçi A, Cirit OS. Investigation of the prevalence of cystic echinococcosis in Gaziantep-Türkiye by ELI.H.A Echinococcus ELITech between 2015-2022. Trakya Univ J Nat Sci. 2024; 25: 91–6.
13
Çelik T, Alev C, Akgün S, Güldoğan E, Şahin F. Adıyaman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi’ne 2013-2020 yılları arasında kistik ekinokokkozis şüphesiyle başvuran olguların serolojik değerlendirme sonuçları [A retrospective evaluation of serological results of cystic echinococcosis suspected cases admitted to Adıyaman Training and Research Hospital between 2013-2020]. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2022; 46: 140-4. Turkish.
14
Bağcı ÖU, Akarsu G. Kistik ekinokokkoz ayırıcı tanısında indirekt hemaglütinasyon testinin tanısal performansının değerlendirilmesi: Tek merkez deneyimi. J Ankara Univ Fac Med. 2025; 78: 69-75.
15
Alver O, Payaslıoğlu AM, Özakın C, Esen S. Kistik ekinokokkozis ile ilgili 2017 ve 2018 yılları laboratuvar sonuçları. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2021; 45: 25-9.
16
Çiftçi N, Ateş F, Dağı HT, Fındık D. Kistik ekinokokkoz ön tanısı alan hastaların seropozitifliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. Gen Med J. 2017; 27: 91-4.
17
Behçet M, Avcıoğlu F. Kistik ekinokokkozis şüpheli hastaların indirekt hemaglütinasyon yöntemiyle değerlendirilmesi. J Biotechnol Strateg Health Res. 2020; 4: 26-31.
18
Şafak B. Balıkesir Atatürk Devlet Hastanesi 2011-2013 yılları arası kistik ekinokokkozis serolojisi sonuçları. Kocatepe Med J. 2015; 16: 265-8.
19
Altin N, Acar A, Ergun O, Kuzi S, Ulusoy TÜ, Habiloğlu AD, et al. Review of hydatid cyst cases and causes of recurrences complicating treatment, a 7-year cross-sectional study from Turkey: a single-center, retrospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 104e42861
20
Çelik M, Baran Aİ, Altındağ D, Arslan Y, Tarcan T, Sunnetcioglu M, et al. Retrospective evaluation of adult hydatid cyst cases. Genel Tıp Derg. 2024; 34: 166-70.
21
Akkaya Işık S, Seyman D, Zerdali E, Ayan S, Kakaliçoğlu D, Ayaz T, et al. Kist hidatik hastalığı nedeniyle takip ve tedavi edilen 170 olgunun irdelenmesi: çok merkezli bir çalışma Evaluation of 170 followed-up cases treated for hydatid disease: a multicentre study]. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2020; 44: 197-202. Turkish.
22
Ulusan Bağcı Ö. COVID-19 pandemisinin kistik ekinokokkoz indirekt hemaglütinasyon test dinamikleri üzerindeki etkisinin değerlendirilmesi: tek merkez deneyimi [Evaluation of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cystic echinococcosis indirect hemagglutination test dynamics: a single-center experience]. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2023; 47: 166-70. Turkish.
23
Güreser AS, Duman GG, Sarzhanov F, Karasartova D, Doğruman Al F, Taylan Özkan HA. Western blot assay of anti- Echinococcus granulosus antibody positive serum samples by indirect haemagglutination method. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2019; 53: 373–80.